Re: [PATCH] Add contrib/stg-gitk: helper script to run gitk
- From
Baz <brian.ewins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 10, 2007, 10:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2faad3050701100234g1580d344lcc84b143ee965a23@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070109220332.GD17093@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
On 09/01/07, Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> (let's go off-topic) > > That makes me think that such command names like "show" are a bit too > general: stgit uses "show" for patches, but nothing says it is for a > patch and not a series. > > Also, when presenting GIT/StGIT to co-workers, I found them to be > confused by eg. "stg push" and "stg commit" having different semantics > than "git push" and "git commit".
They're also confusing because the stg docs and other stg commands consistently talk about patches being 'applied' or 'unapplied', not 'pushed'. If stg push/pop were to make sense as single commands they would be eg stg apply/unapply, or stg patch-apply, stg patch-unapply.
Cheers, Baz