git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

SHA256 support not experimental, or?

From
Adam Majer <adamm@zombino.com>
Date
Jun 28, 2023, 16:28 UTC
Message-ID
<2f5de416-04ba-c23d-1e0b-83bb655829a7@zombino.com>
Hi all,
Is sha256 still considered experimental or can it be assumed to be stable?

The usecase here is we are planning on moving to sha256 repositories mostly due to integrity guarantees, hypothetical or otherwise. What is important is not the initial interop challenges with sha1 repos, but whether the on-disk format will remain compatible with future versions of git. At minimum, the on-disk format would be converted by some future version(s) of git into another one and not be an end-of-the-road because it was "experimental" where dataloss is an implied risk.

Attached is a patch that removes the scary text, if indeed sha256 should be viewed as stable.

Cheers,
- Adam
---
 Documentation/git.txt                      | 4 ++--
 Documentation/object-format-disclaimer.txt | 8 ++------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git.txt b/Documentation/git.txt
index f0cafa2290..7c150a473c 100644
--- a/Documentation/git.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git.txt
@@ -553,8 +553,8 @@ double-quotes and respecting backslash escapes. E.g., the value
 	If this variable is set, the default hash algorithm for new
 	repositories will be set to this value. This value is
 	ignored when cloning and the setting of the remote repository
-	is always used. The default is "sha1". THIS VARIABLE IS
-	EXPERIMENTAL! See `--object-format` in linkgit:git-init[1].
+	is always used. The default is "sha1".
+    See `--object-format` in linkgit:git-init[1].
 
 Git Commits
 ~~~~~~~~~~~
diff --git a/Documentation/object-format-disclaimer.txt b/Documentation/object-format-disclaimer.txt
index 4cb106f0d1..dccee9c400 100644
--- a/Documentation/object-format-disclaimer.txt
+++ b/Documentation/object-format-disclaimer.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,2 @@
-THIS OPTION IS EXPERIMENTAL! SHA-256 support is experimental and still
-in an early stage.  A SHA-256 repository will in general not be able to
-share work with "regular" SHA-1 repositories.  It should be assumed
-that, e.g., Git internal file formats in relation to SHA-256
-repositories may change in backwards-incompatible ways.  Only use
-`--object-format=sha256` for testing purposes.
+Note: SHA-256 repository will in general not be able to
+share work with "regular" SHA-1 repositories.
-- 
2.41.0
Next: brian m. carlson
Message 1 of 21 in “SHA256 support not experimental, or?”
  1. Adam MajerJun 28, 2023
  2. brian m. carlsonJun 29, 2023
  3. Adam MajerJun 29, 2023
  4. Junio C HamanoJun 29, 2023
  5. Adam MajerJun 29, 2023
  6. Junio C HamanoJun 29, 2023
  7. brian m. carlsonJun 29, 2023
  8. Junio C HamanoJun 29, 2023
  9. brian m. carlsonJun 30, 2023
  10. Patrick SteinhardtJun 30, 2023
  11. Adam MajerJun 30, 2023
  12. Patrick SteinhardtJun 30, 2023
  13. Son Luong NgocJun 30, 2023
  14. Junio C HamanoJun 30, 2023
  15. Adam MajerJul 20, 2023
  16. Junio C HamanoJul 20, 2023
  17. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2023
  18. Adam MajerJul 31, 2023
  19. doc: sha256 is no longer experimentalAdam Majer, Jul 31, 2023
  20. Junio C HamanoJul 31, 2023
  21. Adam MajerJul 31, 2023

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.