Re: [PATCH 2/2] blame: enable and test the sparse index
- From
Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 23, 2021, 14:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2ac61ff8-816d-99b4-333b-381d9a1dbdeb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BGM-57Xxxb-MRvkkgGFbVn4z6PEZFKryuBCwj7Ymr_oSA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/22/21 11:57 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
Show 58 quoted lines
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:25 AM Lessley Dennington via GitGitGadget > <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> From: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> >> >> Enable the sparse index for the 'git blame' command. The index was already >> not expanded with this command, so the most interesting thing to do is to >> add tests that verify that 'git blame' behaves correctly when the sparse >> index is enabled and that its performance improves. More specifically, these >> cases are: >> >> 1. The index is not expanded for 'blame' when given paths in the sparse >> checkout cone at multiple levels. >> >> 2. Performance measurably improves for 'blame' with sparse index when given >> paths in the sparse checkout cone at multiple levels. >> >> The `p2000` tests demonstrate a ~60% execution time reduction when running >> 'blame' for a file two levels deep and and a ~30% execution time reduction >> for a file three levels deep. >> >> Test before after >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> 2000.62: git blame f2/f4/a (full-v3) 0.31 0.32 +3.2% >> 2000.63: git blame f2/f4/a (full-v4) 0.29 0.31 +6.9% >> 2000.64: git blame f2/f4/a (sparse-v3) 0.55 0.23 -58.2% >> 2000.65: git blame f2/f4/a (sparse-v4) 0.57 0.23 -59.6% >> 2000.66: git blame f2/f4/f3/a (full-v3) 0.77 0.85 +10.4% >> 2000.67: git blame f2/f4/f3/a (full-v4) 0.78 0.81 +3.8% >> 2000.68: git blame f2/f4/f3/a (sparse-v3) 1.07 0.72 -32.7% >> 2000.99: git blame f2/f4/f3/a (sparse-v4) 1.05 0.73 -30.5% > > Looks good. > >> We do not include paths outside the sparse checkout cone because blame >> currently does not support blaming files outside of the sparse definition. >> Attempting to do so fails with the following error: >> >> fatal: no such path '<path outside sparse definition>' in HEAD > > While technically accurate, this wording is misleading; it implies > that there is something unique to sparse checkouts, and perhaps even > to cone mode, affecting how blame handles files not in the working > directory. That's not true, though; git blame without a revision has > always reported an error when given a file that does not exist in the > working tree. Try this in git.git: > > $ rm t/README > $ git blame t/README > fatal: Cannot lstat 't/README': No such file or directory > > The reason is that with no revisions, calling git blame with a > filename means asking the question "Which commit did each line in that > file come from?" If there's no file, the question just doesn't make > sense. You could make sense of it by thinking in terms of some > revision of the file, but then you're passing a revision along -- > which works just fine in a sparse checkout too. >
Thank you for clarifying that this is actually the expected behavior and isn't something we need to "fix" for sparse-checkout. I will update accordingly for v5.
Show 54 quoted lines
>> >> Signed-off-by: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> >> --- >> builtin/blame.c | 3 +++ >> t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh | 2 ++ >> t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- >> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/builtin/blame.c b/builtin/blame.c >> index 641523ff9af..af3d81e2bd4 100644 >> --- a/builtin/blame.c >> +++ b/builtin/blame.c >> @@ -902,6 +902,9 @@ int cmd_blame(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >> long anchor; >> const int hexsz = the_hash_algo->hexsz; >> >> + prepare_repo_settings(the_repository); >> + the_repository->settings.command_requires_full_index = 0; >> + >> setup_default_color_by_age(); >> git_config(git_blame_config, &output_option); >> repo_init_revisions(the_repository, &revs, NULL); >> diff --git a/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh b/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh >> index bff93f16e93..9ac76a049b8 100755 >> --- a/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh >> +++ b/t/perf/p2000-sparse-operations.sh >> @@ -115,5 +115,7 @@ test_perf_on_all git reset --hard >> test_perf_on_all git reset -- does-not-exist >> test_perf_on_all git diff >> test_perf_on_all git diff --staged >> +test_perf_on_all git blame $SPARSE_CONE/a >> +test_perf_on_all git blame $SPARSE_CONE/f3/a >> >> test_done >> diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh >> index 1070bff1a83..54826e858a9 100755 >> --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh >> +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh >> @@ -485,15 +485,16 @@ test_expect_success 'blame with pathspec inside sparse definition' ' >> test_all_match git blame deep/deeper1/deepest/a >> ' >> >> -# TODO: blame currently does not support blaming files outside of the >> -# sparse definition. It complains that the file doesn't exist locally. >> -test_expect_failure 'blame with pathspec outside sparse definition' ' >> +# Blame does not support blaming files outside of the sparse >> +# definition, so we verify this scenario. > > As above, this is misleading. It'd be better to word it something like: > > # Without a revision specified, blame will error if passed any file that > # is not present in the working directory (even if the file is tracked). > # Here we just verify that this is also true with sparse checkouts. >
Thank you. Will update for v5.
Show 33 quoted lines
>> +test_expect_success 'blame with pathspec outside sparse definition' ' >> init_repos && >> >> - test_all_match git blame folder1/a && >> - test_all_match git blame folder2/a && >> - test_all_match git blame deep/deeper2/a && >> - test_all_match git blame deep/deeper2/deepest/a >> + test_sparse_match git sparse-checkout set && >> + test_sparse_match test_must_fail git blame folder1/a && >> + test_sparse_match test_must_fail git blame folder2/a && >> + test_sparse_match test_must_fail git blame deep/deeper2/a && >> + test_sparse_match test_must_fail git blame deep/deeper2/deepest/a >> ' >> >> test_expect_success 'checkout and reset (mixed)' ' >> @@ -871,6 +872,15 @@ test_expect_success 'sparse-index is not expanded: merge conflict in cone' ' >> ) >> ' >> >> +test_expect_success 'sparse index is not expanded: blame' ' >> + init_repos && >> + >> + ensure_not_expanded blame a && >> + ensure_not_expanded blame deep/a && >> + ensure_not_expanded blame deep/deeper1/a && >> + ensure_not_expanded blame deep/deeper1/deepest/a >> +' >> + >> # NEEDSWORK: a sparse-checkout behaves differently from a full checkout >> # in this scenario, but it shouldn't. >> test_expect_success 'reset mixed and checkout orphan' ' >> -- >> gitgitgadget