Re: Improve 'git help' with basic user guide linkss

> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 10:54 PM
>> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
>>
>>> My initial https://github.com/PhilipOakley/git/commit/e6217d simply
>>> updates
>>> -  N_("See 'git help <command>' for more information on a specific
>>> command.");
>>> +  N_("See 'git help <command>' for more information on a specific
>>> command.\n"
>>> +     "Or 'git help <guide>', such as 'tutorial' for an introduction
>>> to Git.");
>>> as a starter for the new users.
>>
>> Yeah, that would be a good change to make to "git help<RETURN>"
>> output.
>
> I'll sort some patches early next week (the weekend's committed 
> elsewhere)
>
>>
>>> My view is that help --all (-a) is essentially incomplete as it
>>> currently doesn't provide all the help.
>>
>> It has always been about "tell me all subcommands", not about "give
>> me all the help you could give me".  You are not adding a "help"
>> subcommand to a system you wrote last week.  Changing the semantics
>> this late feels, eh, too late.
>
> OK, I'll limit the the follow-ons to just an extra --guides option 
> (probably just a list of the common guides initially), and 
> leave --all(-a) for just the commands.
>