RE: merge --no-ff is NOT mentioned in help
- From
- Vanderhoof, Tzadik <tzadik.vanderhoof@optum360.com>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2016, 14:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2C8817BDA27E034F8E9A669458E375EF2BE95B@APSWP0428.ms.ds.uhc.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANoM8SVXeeZsc40xgVqZep_9oT=J2h4mOO0Ksn+kb0g8Ct=KrQ@mail.gmail.com>
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Rappazzo [mailto:rappazzo@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:58 AM To: Vanderhoof, Tzadik Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: merge --no-ff is NOT mentioned in help
Show 44 quoted lines
>(Please reply inline)
>
>On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Vanderhoof, Tzadik <tzadik.vanderhoof@optum360.com> wrote:
>> I am running: git version 2.10.1.windows.1
>>
>> I typed: git merge -h
>>
>> and got:
>>
>> usage: git merge [<options>] [<commit>...]
>> or: git merge [<options>] <msg> HEAD <commit>
>> or: git merge --abort
>>
>> -n do not show a diffstat at the end of the merge
>> --stat show a diffstat at the end of the merge
>> --summary (synonym to --stat)
>> --log[=<n>] add (at most <n>) entries from shortlog to merge commit message
>> --squash create a single commit instead of doing a merge
>> --commit perform a commit if the merge succeeds (default)
>> -e, --edit edit message before committing
>> --ff allow fast-forward (default)
>> --ff-only abort if fast-forward is not possible
>> --rerere-autoupdate update the index with reused conflict resolution if possible
>> --verify-signatures verify that the named commit has a valid GPG signature
>> -s, --strategy <strategy>
>> merge strategy to use
>> -X, --strategy-option <option=value>
>> option for selected merge strategy
>> -m, --message <message>
>> merge commit message (for a non-fast-forward merge)
>> -v, --verbose be more verbose
>> -q, --quiet be more quiet
>> --abort abort the current in-progress merge
>> --allow-unrelated-histories
>> allow merging unrelated histories
>> --progress force progress reporting
>> -S, --gpg-sign[=<key-id>]
>> GPG sign commit
>> --overwrite-ignore update ignored files (default)
>>
>> Notice there is NO mention of the "--no-ff" option
>
>I understand. On my system I can reproduce this by providing a bad argument to `git merge`. This is the output from the arg setup. For "boolean" arguments (like '--ff'), there is an automatic counter argument with "no-" in there ('--no-ff') to disable the option. Maybe it would make sense to word the output to include both.
>Would you accept a pull request from me for this change?
Show 22 quoted lines
> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Rappazzo [mailto:rappazzo@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:37 AM >> To: Vanderhoof, Tzadik >> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: merge --no-ff is NOT mentioned in help >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Vanderhoof, Tzadik <tzadik.vanderhoof@optum360.com> wrote: >>> When I do: "git merge -h" to get help, the option "--no-ff" is left out of the list of options. >> >> I am running git version 2.10.0, and running git merge --help contains these lines: >> >> --ff >> When the merge resolves as a fast-forward, only update the branch pointer, without creating a merge commit. This is the default behavior. >> >> --no-ff >> Create a merge commit even when the merge resolves as a fast-forward. This is the default behaviour when merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag. >> >> --ff-only >> Refuse to merge and exit with a non-zero status unless the current HEAD is already up-to-date or the merge can be resolved as a fast-forward.
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.