Re: Efficient cloning from svn (with multiple branches/tags subdirs)

> Hello,
>
> Avery Pennarun wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been thinking about this myself for some time.  One option that
>>>> might be "interesting" would be to just grab the *entire* svn tree
>>>> (from the root), and then use git-subtree[1] to slice and dice it into
>>>> branches using your local copy of git (which is fast and uses no
>>>> bandwidth) instead of during the svn fetch (which is slow and uses
>>>> lots of bandwidth).  I think it would also simplify the git-svn code
>>>> quite a lot, at least for fetching, since there would always be a
>>>> global view of the tree and SVN things like "copy branch A to tag B"
>>>> would just be exactly that.
>>>
>>> This was actually the original use case of git svn back when I started.
>>>
>>>  git svn clone SVNREPO_ROOT   (without --stdlayout)
>>>
>>> It's still an option if you have the disk space for the working copies,
>>> but I had to create the branches/tags support since the working copies
>>> would be become prohibitively large.  If git-subtree could be
>>> taught to work on a bare repo (git svn has a --no-checkout option)
>>> it might be an option, too.
>
> Thank you for your suggestions. Unfortunately, I'm not really familiar with
> git-subtree and how it could work with git-svn, sorry.
>
> I've tried another workaround: using svnsync to pull the repository only
> once, and only then using git-svn fetch, locally, so as to avoid too much
> network traffic (I don't mind too much if it loops locally). I was hoping to
> be able to change the URL of the repository to the original one afterwards,
> but it doesn't seem to work so easily, because of the commit IDs. I'm
> assuming not having the same will cause problems for further fetches (this
> time directly from the original SVN repository) and for potential dcommits.
>
> When I do this:
>  git init
>  git svn init -s --prefix=svn/ file:///path/to/local/restlet-svnroot
>  git svn fetch -r 1:2
>
> I get this ID, for example:
>  r2 = c69a0b98d288a6e4e8779b50962b7fc65c4622e8
>
> If I do this using the original http://restlet.tigris.org/svn/restlet, I get
> this:
>  r2 = ce3b82915e92fe1ccf6ddedacd9d74b30bd4de86
>
>
> I've even tried to install a Apache-based subversion server locally and make
> it believe it was restlet.tigris.org (by editing /etc/hosts and creating the
> appropriate VirtualHost), but this generates another SHA1 ID. (That's of
> course not a solution that would be generalisable.)
>
> I've had a quick look at the git-svn code to see how this ID was generated,
> but couldn't find anything obvious.
> I realise this isn't the cleanest approach possible, but any suggestion
> would be appreciated.