Re: worktrees vs. alternates
- From
- Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>
- Date
- May 16, 2018, 19:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2828274.Q9q2dc6g5t@mfick-lnx>
- In-Reply-To
- <e8776c83-ea57-456d-5bc8-ca2fc990bed0@linuxfoundation.org>
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 03:01:13 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On 05/16/18 14:26, Martin Fick wrote: > > If you are going to keep the unreferenced objects around > > forever, it might be better to keep them around in > > packed > > form? > > I'm undecided about that. On the one hand this does create > lots of small files and inevitably causes (some) > performance degradation. On the other hand, I don't want > to keep useless objects in the pack, because that would > also cause performance degradation for people cloning the > "mother repo." If my assumptions on any of that are > incorrect, I'm happy to learn more.
My suggestion is to use science, not logic or hearsay. :) i.e. test it!
-Martin
-- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation