Re: Should --update-refs exclude refs pointing to the current HEAD?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024, at 08:40, Stefan Haller wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Coming back to this after almost a year, I can say that I'm still
> running into this problem relatively frequently, and it is annoying
> every single time. Excluding refs pointing at the current head from
> being updated, as proposed above, would be a big usability improvement
> for me.
Sounds like a ref-stash command is in order…
# I want a new branch
git checkout -b new
# But I don’t want it to be affected by the next rebase
git ref-stash push
git rebase [...]
# Now I’m done: put the ref back where it was
git ref-stash pop--
Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>