git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] clone: support cloning of filtered bundles

From
PWPhillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date
Jan 14, 2024, 18:00 UTC
Message-ID
<24b82309-34e9-49a0-983b-7e94dad3d06b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<pull.1644.git.git.1705231010118.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Hi Nikolay
On 14/01/2024 11:16, Nikolay Edigaryev via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> From: Nikolay Edigaryev <edigaryev@gmail.com>
> 
> f18b512bbb (bundle: create filtered bundles, 2022-03-09) introduced an
> incredibly useful ability to create filtered bundles, which advances
> the partial clone/promisor support in Git and allows for archiving
> large repositories to object storages like S3 in bundles that are:
> 
> * easy to manage
>    * bundle is just a single file, it's easier to guarantee atomic
>      replacements in object storages like S3 and they are faster to
>      fetch than a bare repository since there's only a single GET
>      request involved
> * incredibly tiny
>    * no indexes (which may be more than 10 MB for some repositories)
>      and other fluff, compared to cloning a bare repository
>    * bundle can be filtered to only contain the tips of refs neccessary
>      for e.g. code-analysis purposes
> 
> However, in 86fdd94d72 (clone: fail gracefully when cloning filtered
> bundle, 2022-03-09) the cloning of such bundles was disabled, with a
> note that this behavior is not desired, and it the long-term this
> should be possible.
> 
> The commit above states that it's not possible to have this at the
> moment due to lack of remote and a repository-global config that
> specifies an object filter, yet it's unclear why a remote-specific
> config can't be used instead, which is what this change does.

As I understand it if you're cloning from a bundle file then then there is no remote so how can we set a remote-specific config?

I'm surprised that the proposed change does not require the user to pass "--filter" to "git clone" as I expected that we'd want to check that the filter on the command line was compatible with the filter used to create the bundle. Allowing "git clone" to create a partial clone without the user asking for it by passing the "--filter" option feels like is going to end up confusing users.

> +test_expect_success 'cloning from filtered bundle works' '
> +	git bundle create partial.bdl --all --filter=blob:none &&
> +	git clone --bare partial.bdl partial 2>err

The redirection hides any error message which will make debugging test failures harder. It would be nice to see this test check any config set when cloning and that git commands can run successfully in the repository.

Best Wishes
Phillip
Previous: Nikolay Edigaryev via GitGitGadgetNext: Nikolay Edigaryev
Message 2 of 9 in “clone: support cloning of filtered bundles”
  1. clone: support cloning of filtered bundlesNikolay Edigaryev via GitGitGadget, Jan 14, 2024
  2. Phillip WoodJan 14, 2024
  3. Nikolay EdigaryevJan 14, 2024
  4. Nikolay EdigaryevJan 14, 2024
  5. phillip.wood123@gmail.comJan 15, 2024
  6. phillip.wood123@gmail.comJan 15, 2024
  7. Junio C HamanoJan 15, 2024
  8. Junio C HamanoJan 15, 2024
  9. Nikolay EdigaryevJan 16, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.