[PATCH] add -p: fix worktree patch mode prompts
- From
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
- Date
- Sep 14, 2022, 09:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2463c4b9-313b-032f-9313-d1421f71f111@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJXaddZwqGabdjmgc22eCYCdBw6nxcPbPfom26PwG3xvKEN93w@mail.gmail.com>
cee6cb7300 (built-in add -p: implement the "worktree" patch modes, 2019-12-21) added the worktree patch modes to the built-in add -p. Its commit message claims to be a port of 2f0896ec3ad4 (restore: support --patch, 2019-04-25), which did the same for the script git-add--interactive.perl.
The script mentioned only the worktree in its prompt messages in worktree mode, while the built-in mentions the worktree and also the index, even though the command doesn't actually affect the index.
2c8bd8471a (checkout -p: handle new files correctly, 2020-05-27) added new prompt messages for addition that also mention the index in worktree mode in the built-in, but not in the script.
Correct these prompts to state that only the worktree will be affected.
Reported-by: David Plumpton <david.plumpton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> --- Patch created using --function-context for easier review. Note that help_patch_text is already correct.
add-patch.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/add-patch.c b/add-patch.c index 29f9456df3..33ecd8398a 100644 --- a/add-patch.c +++ b/add-patch.c @@ -188,22 +188,22 @@ static struct patch_mode patch_mode_checkout_nothead = { static struct patch_mode patch_mode_worktree_head = { .diff_cmd = { "diff-index", NULL }, .apply_args = { "-R", NULL }, .apply_check_args = { "-R", NULL }, .is_reverse = 1, .prompt_mode = { - N_("Discard mode change from index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), - N_("Discard deletion from index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), - N_("Discard addition from index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), - N_("Discard this hunk from index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Discard mode change from worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Discard deletion from worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Discard addition from worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Discard this hunk from worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), }, .edit_hunk_hint = N_("If the patch applies cleanly, the edited hunk " "will immediately be marked for discarding."), .help_patch_text = N_("y - discard this hunk from worktree\n" "n - do not discard this hunk from worktree\n" "q - quit; do not discard this hunk or any of the remaining " "ones\n" "a - discard this hunk and all later hunks in the file\n" "d - do not discard this hunk or any of the later hunks in " "the file\n"), }; @@ -211,21 +211,21 @@ static struct patch_mode patch_mode_worktree_head = { static struct patch_mode patch_mode_worktree_nothead = { .diff_cmd = { "diff-index", "-R", NULL }, .apply_args = { NULL }, .apply_check_args = { NULL }, .prompt_mode = { - N_("Apply mode change to index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), - N_("Apply deletion to index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), - N_("Apply addition to index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), - N_("Apply this hunk to index and worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Apply mode change to worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Apply deletion to worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Apply addition to worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), + N_("Apply this hunk to worktree [y,n,q,a,d%s,?]? "), }, .edit_hunk_hint = N_("If the patch applies cleanly, the edited hunk " "will immediately be marked for applying."), .help_patch_text = N_("y - apply this hunk to worktree\n" "n - do not apply this hunk to worktree\n" "q - quit; do not apply this hunk or any of the remaining " "ones\n" "a - apply this hunk and all later hunks in the file\n" "d - do not apply this hunk or any of the later hunks in " "the file\n"), }; -- 2.37.2