Re: [BUG] send-email propagates "In-Reply-To"
- From
Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2021, 21:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2412df60-f8ee-ab0f-08b2-20a0b6b641fa@posteo.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <YSPomC95hxZZTHRe@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On 23/08/2021 20:27, Jeff King wrote:
> But either that should go into its own patch, or the commit message > should be modified to explain that it is covering not just > in-reply-to/references, but we think this fixes all similar variables.
Fixed, opted for latter [1].
> You'd want something like the patch below (and possibly something > similar for the $subject handling).
Thanks a lot! my last question for the patch would now be, how do I use your snippet? Do I add you to S-o-b of the single patch, do I split the patches with the second S-o-b being yours, or do I submit only the first and you will submit the second?
> Both of the new tests fail without your patch and pass with it, but: > > - note the weird behavior I found with --in-reply-to; this is > something we might want to address at the same time
I think this case must error? The definition of the "--in-reply-to" does not declare it as a default, so it must be enforced (and it is), but it's also very unintuitive the file value is discarded. Who would decide the behaviour spec?
> - applying your patch fails the earlier t9001.52 ("In-Reply-To without
> --chain-reply-to"). I didn't dig into what's going on there.Fixed [1].
Best regards, Marvin
[1] https://github.com/mhaeuser/git/commit/5f2ff790cc0d0d779bc252b08f9c9c632c4ff01c