Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] reftable: don't memset() a NULL from failed malloc()

> 
> On Fri, Apr 15 2022, René Scharfe wrote:
> 
>> Am 15.04.22 um 12:21 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
>>> Return NULL instead of possibly feeding a NULL to memset() in
>>> reftable_calloc(). This issue was noted by GCC 12's -fanalyzer:
>>>
>>> 	reftable/publicbasics.c: In function ‘reftable_calloc’:
>>> 	reftable/publicbasics.c:43:9: error: use of possibly-NULL ‘p’ where non-null expected [CWE-690] [-Werror=analyzer-possible-null-argument]
>>> 	   43 |         memset(p, 0, sz);
>>> 	      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> 	[...]
>>>
>>> This bug has been with us ever since this code was added in
>>> ef8a6c62687 (reftable: utility functions, 2021-10-07).
>>
>> Not sure it's a bug, or limited to this specific location.  AFAICS it's
>> more a general lack of handling of allocation failures in the reftable
>> code.  Perhaps it was a conscious decision to let the system deal with
>> them via segfaults?
> 
> I think it's just buggy, it tries to deal with malloc returning NULL in
> other contexts.

>> When the code is used by Git eventually it should use xmalloc and
>> xrealloc instead of calling malloc(3) and realloc(3) directly, to
>> handle allocation failures explicitly, and to support GIT_ALLOC_LIMIT.
>> This will calm down the analyzer and extend the safety to the rest of
>> the reftable code, not just this memset call.
> 
> Yeah, its whole custom malloc handling should go away.