Re: [PATCH 1/4] run-command: add pipe_output to run_processes_parallel

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 27, 2022, 09:05 UTC
Message-ID: <220927.86ill9yymv.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFySSZA=tThoHdTY7+bMStvC=xeeyMiv4aVDYt-eNW2mQE10qg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 26 2022, Calvin Wan wrote:

Show 6 quoted lines

>>  * Why are we configuring an API behaviour via a global variable in
>>    21st century?
>
> I was mimicking how "ungroup" worked, but now that Avar mentions
> that pattern was for a quick regression fix, I can fix it to pass it in as a
> parameter.

I don't know if you started this work or not, but I had a WIP rebase of those on-list patches lying around in my tree, which I'm rebasing on "master" currently.

Some of it's a bit tricky with the in-tree activity since then, I'll send them in when they're ready, maybe you already did your own rebasing of them, or maybe it helps & you'd like to base a re-submission on top of them.