Re: [PATCH v2] cmd-list.perl: fix identifying man sections
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2022, 08:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <220923.86fsgi4gl6.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20220923080733.1995862-1-martin.agren@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 23 2022, Martin Ågren wrote:
Show 28 quoted lines
> We attribute each documentation text file to a man section by finding a
> line in the file that looks like "gitfoo(<digit>)". Commit cc75e556a9
> ("scalar: add to 'git help -a' command list", 2022-09-02) updated this
> logic to look not only for "gitfoo" but also "scalarfoo". In doing so,
> it forgot to account for the fact that after the updated regex has found
> a match, the man section is no longer to be found in `$1` but now lives
> in `$2`.
>
> This makes our git(1) manpage look as follows:
>
> Main porcelain commands
> git-add(git)
> Add file contents to the index.
>
> [...]
>
> gitk(git)
> The Git repository browser.
>
> scalar(scalar)
> A tool for managing large Git repositories.
>
> Restore the man sections by not capturing the (git|scalar) part of the
> match into `$1`.
>
> As noted by Ævar [1], we could even match any "foo" rather than just
> "gitfoo" and "scalarfoo", but that's a larger change. For now, just fix
> the regression in cc75e556a9.Thanks for the quick turn-around, this looks good to me in this form.
Show 23 quoted lines
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/220923.86wn9u4joo.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/#t
>
> Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
> ---
> Thanks Ævar for having a look at v1.
>
> Documentation/cmd-list.perl | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cmd-list.perl b/Documentation/cmd-list.perl
> index 9515a499a3..755a110bc4 100755
> --- a/Documentation/cmd-list.perl
> +++ b/Documentation/cmd-list.perl
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ sub format_one {
> $state = 0;
> open I, '<', "$name.txt" or die "No such file $name.txt";
> while (<I>) {
> - if (/^(git|scalar)[a-z0-9-]*\(([0-9])\)$/) {
> + if (/^(?:git|scalar)[a-z0-9-]*\(([0-9])\)$/) {
> $mansection = $1;
> next;
> }Just for anyone doing future archaeology / digging into the "larger change": The reason I felt safe in removing the "git" matching entirely is because the larger context here is that we're parsing only the very start of the *.txt. I.e. we would not want this: git(1) ====== NAME ---- git - the stupid content tracker
foo(2)
To report Documentation/git.txt as being a "foo" in man section 2, but that will not happen because as soon as we see a "NAME" line followed by a "----" line we'll extract that one line of description, so even if our regex would have eagerly matched that "foo(2)" we won't see it.
Now, having written and looked at this with fresh eyes this would be an
even better & more logical thing to do:
diff --git a/Documentation/cmd-list.perl b/Documentation/cmd-list.perl
index 755a110bc48..0bc4c803a10 100755
--- a/Documentation/cmd-list.perl
+++ b/Documentation/cmd-list.perl
@@ -1,38 +1,38 @@
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use File::Compare qw(compare);
sub format_one {
my ($out, $nameattr) = @_;
my ($name, $attr) = @$nameattr;
my ($state, $description);
my $mansection;
$state = 0;
open I, '<', "$name.txt" or die "No such file $name.txt";
while (<I>) {
- if (/^(?:git|scalar)[a-z0-9-]*\(([0-9])\)$/) {
+ if (/^\Q$name\E\(([0-9])\)$/) {
$mansection = $1;
next;
}
if (/^NAME$/) {
$state = 1;
next;
}
if ($state == 1 && /^----$/) {
$state = 2;
next;
}
next if ($state != 2);
chomp;
$description = $_;
last;
}
close I;
if (!defined $description) {
die "No description found in $name.txt";
}
if (my ($verify_name, $text) = ($description =~ /^($name) - (.*)/)) {
print $out "linkgit:$name\[$mansection\]::\n\t";
if ($attr =~ / deprecated /) {
print $out "(deprecated) ";
}It yields the exact same result as Martin's patch above according to the doc-diff, but as the -U25 context shows we already have a hard dependency on the "scalar -" part of the description line matching the name of the file ("scalar.txt") is something we should be doing.
Anyway, this is more than good enough for now, thanks! There's also much bigger issues with the script, and we can leave that all aside from now (e.g. if it dies the Makefile doesn't report an error, ouch!).