git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: use awk instead of expr for a POSIX non integer check

From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 12, 2022, 10:38 UTC
Message-ID
<220312.86o82bfo7x.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAPig+cQNeTAvWHm2GUGc2i=FKF2V6Gqkmmsw4kDOTzrSYEbgxA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 11 2022, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 39 quoted lines
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:14 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>> >> This seems to work, though it's getting a bit verbose:
>> >>
>> >>     awk '/^glibc / { split($2,v,"."); if (sprintf("%s.%s", v[1], v[2])
>> >> - 2.34 < 0) exit 1 }'
>> >
>> > In general it is a good discipline to question a pipeline that
>> > preprocesses input fed to a script written in a language with full
>> > programming power like awk and perl (and to lessor extent, sed) to
>> > see if we can come up with a simpler solution without pipeline
>> > helping to solve what these languages are invented to solve, and I
>> > very much appreciate your exploration ;-)
>>
>> I agree :) But the first language we've got here is C. Rather than
>> fiddle around with getconf, awk/sed etc. why not just the rather
>> trivial:
>>
>>         +#include "test-tool.h"
>>         +#include "cache.h"
>>         +
>>         +int cmd__glibc_config(int argc, const char **argv)
>>         +{
>>         +#ifdef __GNU_LIBRARY__
>>         +       printf("%d\n%d\n", __GLIBC__, __GLIBC_MINOR__);
>>         +       return 0;
>>         +#else
>>         +       return 1;
>>         +#endif
>>         +}
>
> It feels overkill to add this just for this one case which is
> otherwise done easily enough with existing shell tools.
>
> That said, perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see how this
> solution helps us get away from the need for `expr`, `awk`, or `perl`
> since one of those languages would be needed to perform the arithmetic
> comparison (checking if glibc is >= 2.34).

In this case they're \n delimited, so we can use the shell's native whitespace splitting to $(())-compare $1 and $2.

But probably better is to just amend that to call it as "test-tool libc is-glibc-2.34-or-newer" or whatever. Then just do:

	if (__GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && 34 >= __GLIBC_MINOR__))
		return 0;
	return 1;
Previous: Eric SunshineNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 10 of 19 in “test-lib.sh: Use GLIBC_TUNABLES instead of MALLOC_CHECK_ on glibc >= 2.34”
  1. test-lib.sh: Use GLIBC_TUNABLES instead of MALLOC_CHECK_ on glibc >= 2.34Elia Pinto, Mar 4, 2022
  2. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2022
  3. test-lib.sh: use awk instead of expr for a POSIX non integer checkCarlo Marcelo Arenas Belón, Mar 8, 2022
  4. Eric SunshineMar 8, 2022
  5. Eric SunshineMar 8, 2022
  6. Eric SunshineMar 9, 2022
  7. Junio C HamanoMar 9, 2022
  8. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonMar 9, 2022
  9. Eric SunshineMar 11, 2022
  10. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonMar 12, 2022
  11. Junio C HamanoMar 13, 2022
  12. Carlo ArenasMar 13, 2022
  13. Junio C HamanoMar 13, 2022
  14. Eric SunshineMar 11, 2022
  15. Elia PintoMar 13, 2022
  16. Phillip WoodApr 4, 2022
  17. Making the tests ~2.5x faster (was: [PATCH v3] test-lib.sh: Use GLIBC_TUNABLES instead of MALLOC_CHECK_ on glibc >= 2.34)Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Apr 5, 2022
  18. Phillip WoodApr 5, 2022
  19. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 5, 2022

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.