Re: Simple UI question...

> Chris Lee <clee@kde.org> wrote:
> > So I'm trying to figure out the best way to pull out a checkout of the
> > entire tree as of a given revision ID. I have a whole bunch of
> > revision IDs, and I'd like to know what the git equivalent of (say)
> > the following is:
> >
> > svn co -r280600 file:///path/to/svn/repo
> >
> > For the sake of argument, let's say that r280600 imported as
> > 07058310db903317faa300b93004a5a2e0fc2dcc into my git tree.
> >
> > How do I get a pristine checkout in my working copy of the entire tree
> > as the repository saw it at 07058310db903317faa300b93004a5a2e0fc2dcc?
>
> One way is:
>
>   git archive \
>     --format=tar \
>     07058310db903317faa300b93004a5a2e0fc2dcc \
>     | (mkdir ../export; cd ../export; tar xf -)
>
> Would give you a new directory tree which is not related to any
> Git repository, but which contains the exact set of files in 070583.
> But that's probably not what you meant.
>
> > Eric Anholt suggested 'git checkout -b temporary-branch-name
> > $sha1sum';
>
> Yes, that is usually the way you do this.  Unlike the archive trick
> above the result will be in your current working directory and
> will be associated with the current Git repository.  Further you
> can modify this and commit changes if you need to.
>
> > davej suggested 'git-read-tree $sha1sum &&
> > git-checkout-index -a -f'
>
> That's just cruel.  Its only part of the underlying operations that
> git checkout is performing, and its trashing your current branch
> by making HEAD no longer match the index.  And its very low-level.
> And it doesn't really do a 2-way merge to fully update the working
> directory.  Not the best way for a user to perform this action.
> Forget davej ever suggested this.

> > but for some reason, neither of these
> > commands seems to do exactly as I expect. davej's method seems to work
> > for some revision IDs, but not for others, and the other method seems
> > to work just about as well. (The problem I have seen is that, for some
> > revisions, the only files I get in the working copy are the files that
> > were changed in that commit; the rest of the files in the tree do not
> > get checked out.)
>
> The problem is davej's method doesn't take into account what the
> current working directory actually has stored in it.  It does not
> delete any files which should not appear in $sha1sum.  It also
> overwrites more files than it needs to, as it overwrites everything
> instead of just those files which actually differ between the
> current working directory and $sha1sum.