Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3507: pin CHERRY_PICK_HEAD absence for a conflicting --no-commit
- From
Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
- Date
- Sep 5, 2026, 17:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20260905171347.34775-1-f@lex.la>
- In-Reply-To
- <639f29ff-59f3-403d-acbe-e6173a8fbf04@gmail.com>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> In this case I think it is worth checking as we can do it by adding a > single call to test_ref_missing to an existing test and the logic > around when we do and do not write CHERRY_PICK_HEAD is a bit tricky.
That is the justification I should have given. Whether the ref is written depends on the command, on whether the merge started, and on --no-commit, all in one condition, and the conflicting --no-commit case is the one nothing checks. v3 states it that way.