[GSoC][PATCH v2] merge-strategies.adoc: detail submodule merge
- From
Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 20, 2025, 15:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20250220151207.3248-1-lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
Submodule merges are, in general, similar to other merges based on oid three-way-merge. When a conflict happens, however, Git has two special cases (introduced in 68d03e4a6e44) on handling the conflict before yielding it to the user. From the merge-ort and merge-recursive sources:
- "Case #1: a is contained in b or vice versa": both strategies try to perform a fast-forward in the submodules if the commit referred by the conflicted submodule is descendant of another;
- "Case #2: There are one or more merges that contain a and b in the submodule. If there is only one, then present it as a suggestion to the user, but leave it marked unmerged so the user needs to confirm the resolution."
Add a small paragraph on merge-strategies.adoc describing this behavior.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com> ---
This v2 changes the documentation text to a clearer explanation (as suggested in the v1 review), and changes its location to merge-strategies.adoc instead of git-merge.adoc.
This content is duplicated as this works for both `ort` and `recursive` strategies.
Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc | 15 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc b/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc index 5fc54ec060..a7fca249e2 100644 --- a/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc +++ b/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc @@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ ort:: ("Ostensibly Recursive's Twin") and came from the fact that it was written as a replacement for the previous default algorithm, `recursive`. + + In the case where the path is a submodule, if the submodule commit + used on one side of the merge is a descendant of the submodule + commit used on the other side of the merge, Git attempts to + fast-forward to the descendant. Otherwise, Git will treat this case + as a conflict, suggesting as a resolution a submodule commit that + is descendant of the conflicting ones, if one exists. + The 'ort' strategy can take the following options: @@ -95,6 +102,13 @@ recursive:: renames. It does not make use of detected copies. This was the default strategy for resolving two heads from Git v0.99.9k until v2.33.0. + + In the case where the path is a submodule, if the submodule commit + used on one side of the merge is a descendant of the submodule + commit used on the other side of the merge, Git attempts to + fast-forward to the descendant. Otherwise, Git will treat this case + as a conflict, suggesting as a resolution a submodule commit that + is descendant of the conflicting ones, if one exists. + The 'recursive' strategy takes the same options as 'ort'. However, there are three additional options that 'ort' ignores (not documented
-- 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)