Re: Unpredictable peak memory usage when using `git log` command
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 30, 2024, 21:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20240830210607.GB1038751@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <60B730E6-F3C6-4B57-94D6-E5A71754DAF3@gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 03:20:15PM +0300, Yuri Karnilaev wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> 2. Processing commits in batches: > ``` > /usr/bin/time -l -h -p git log --ignore-missing --pretty=format:%H%x02%P%x02%aN%x02%aE%x02%at%x00 -n 1000 --skip=1000000 --numstat > 1.txt > ``` > [...] > Operating System: Mac OS 14.6.1 (23G93) > Git Version: 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
I sent a patch which I think should make things better for you, but I wanted to mention two things in a more general way:
1. You should really consider building a commit-graph file with "git
commit-graph write --reachable". That will reduce the memory usage
for this case, but also improve the CPU quite a bit (we won't have
to open those million skipped commits to chase their parent
pointers). I haven't kept up with the defaults for writing graph files. I
thought gc.writeCommitGraph defaults to "true" these days, though
that wouldn't help in a freshly cloned repository (arguably we
should write the commit graph on clone?). 2. Using "--skip" still has to traverse all of those intermediate
commits. So it's effectively quadratic in the number of commits
overall (you end up skipping the first 1000 over and over). It's been a while since I've had to "paginate" segments of history
like this, but a better solution is along the lines of:- use "-n 1000" to get 1000 commits in each chunk
- use "--boundary" to report the commits that were queued to be traversed next but weren't shown
- in invocations after the first one, start the traversal at those boundary commits, rather than HEAD
You'll probably need to add "%m" to your format to show the
boundaries (or alternatively, you can do the commit selection with
rev-list, and then output the result to "log --no-walk --stdin" to
do the pretty-printing).-Peff