Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2023, #04; Thu, 9)

From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Nov 9, 2023, 07:50 UTC
Message-ID: <20231109075052.GA2699557@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq34xg5ek3.fsf@gitster.g>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:40:28AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> * tb/pair-chunk-expect-size (2023-10-14) 8 commits
>  - midx: read `OOFF` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - midx: read `OIDL` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - midx: read `OIDF` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - commit-graph: read `BIDX` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - commit-graph: read `GDAT` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - commit-graph: read `CDAT` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - commit-graph: read `OIDF` chunk with `pair_chunk_expect()`
>  - chunk-format: introduce `pair_chunk_expect()` helper
> 
>  Code clean-up for jk/chunk-bounds topic.
> 
>  Comments?
>  source: <45cac29403e63483951f7766c6da3c022c68d9f0.1697225110.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
>  source: <cover.1697225110.git.me@ttaylorr.com>

Sorry it took me a while to circle back to this topic. I posted a competing series just now in:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/20231109070310.GA2697602@coredump.intra.peff.net/

that I think should take precedence (and would require some reworking of Taylor's patches, so you'd just eject them in the meantime).

-Peff