Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: fix for gpgsm v2.3
- From
Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
- Date
- Feb 7, 2022, 10:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20220207105240.dk443kcozynlonpp@fs>
- In-Reply-To
- <Yfw0kapgSSWO3Pyx@pobox.com>
On 03.02.2022 15:01, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Show 99 quoted lines
>Hi Fabian,
>
>Fabian Stelzer wrote:
>> gpgsm v2.3 changed some details about its output:
>> - instead of displaying `fingerprint:` for keys it will print `sha1
>> fpr:` and `sha2 fpr:`
>> - some wording of errors has changed
>> - signing will omit an extra debug output line before the [GNUPG]: tag
>
>Thanks for sending this. I noticed these as well, as Fedora
>started shipping gnupg-2.3 a few months back. I have been
>trying (and failing) to make time to submit (when I know I
>won't be too distracted to actually converse about them).
>The commits I made for the tests in Fedora are all here:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git/c/a7d2f7e53
>
>I don't intend that as something anyone here should feel the
>need to chase down. But since they provide some additional
>context on the changes I made in the same area, it might
>help if anyone's curious.
>
>> diff --git a/gpg-interface.c b/gpg-interface.c
>> index b52eb0e2e0..299e7f588a 100644
>> --- a/gpg-interface.c
>> +++ b/gpg-interface.c
>> @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static int sign_buffer_gpg(struct strbuf *buffer, struct strbuf *signature,
>> signature, 1024, &gpg_status, 0);
>> sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
>>
>> - ret |= !strstr(gpg_status.buf, "\n[GNUPG:] SIG_CREATED ");
>> + ret |= !strstr(gpg_status.buf, "[GNUPG:] SIG_CREATED ");
>> strbuf_release(&gpg_status);
>> if (ret)
>> return error(_("gpg failed to sign the data"));
>
>As Junio noted, this loosens the GPG parsing a good bit. I
>worried it could lead to security issues as well. The
>simple fix I made in Fedora was to add a newline to the
>gpg_status string buffer before adding the command output to
>it:
>
> diff --git a/gpg-interface.c b/gpg-interface.c
> index 3e7255a2a9..d179dfb3ab 100644
> --- a/gpg-interface.c
> +++ b/gpg-interface.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,12 @@ static int sign_buffer_gpg(struct strbuf *buffer, struct strbuf *signature,
>
> bottom = signature->len;
>
> + /*
> + * Ensure gpg_status begins with a newline or we'll fail to match if
> + * the SIG_CREATED line is at the start of the gpg output.
> + */
> + strbuf_addch(&gpg_status, '\n');
> +
> /*
> * When the username signingkey is bad, program could be terminated
> * because gpg exits without reading and then write gets SIGPIPE.
>
>https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git/blob/a7d2f7e53/f/0005-gpg-interface-match-SIG_CREATED-if-it-s-the-first-li.patch
>
>But that seemed like a bit of a hack. What I had queued up
>to submit for discussion (as I'm not sure that it isn't
>entirely horrible) used the string-list API to parse the gpg
>output:
>
> diff --git a/gpg-interface.c b/gpg-interface.c
> index b52eb0e2e0..e63ccdcb11 100644
> --- a/gpg-interface.c
> +++ b/gpg-interface.c
> @@ -921,6 +921,7 @@ static int sign_buffer_gpg(struct strbuf *buffer, struct strbuf *signature,
> int ret;
> size_t bottom;
> struct strbuf gpg_status = STRBUF_INIT;
> + struct string_list lines = { .cmp = starts_with };
>
> strvec_pushl(&gpg.args,
> use_format->program,
> @@ -939,8 +940,11 @@ static int sign_buffer_gpg(struct strbuf *buffer, struct strbuf *signature,
> signature, 1024, &gpg_status, 0);
> sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
>
> - ret |= !strstr(gpg_status.buf, "\n[GNUPG:] SIG_CREATED ");
> + string_list_split_in_place(&lines, gpg_status.buf, '\n', -1);
> + ret |= !unsorted_string_list_has_string(&lines, "[GNUPG:] SIG_CREATED ");
> strbuf_release(&gpg_status);
> + string_list_clear(&lines, 0);
> +
> if (ret)
> return error(_("gpg failed to sign the data"));
>
>That's the commit I was most in doubt about though, as my C
>"skills" are close to non-existant. I'd rather have
>something ugly and clear (like the `strbuf_addch(...)`
>above) than clever and wrong in gpg-interface.c.
>
>(To be clear, I mean "clever and wrong" in regard to my use
>of the string list API, not anyone else's code.)string_list_split seems a bit like overkill. My first thought was actually sth like:
cp = strstr(gpg_status.buf, "[GNUPG]: SIG_CREATED"); if (cp == gpg_status.buf || --cp == '\n') // found
But that would fail in case the string came up before the actual success message at the beginning of a line. So Junios variant of using the for() loop is more robust and would normally find the correct string on its first iteration anyway.
Show 18 quoted lines
>
>> diff --git a/t/lib-gpg.sh b/t/lib-gpg.sh
>> index 3e7ee1386a..6c2dd4b14b 100644
>> --- a/t/lib-gpg.sh
>> +++ b/t/lib-gpg.sh
>> @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ test_lazy_prereq GPGSM '
>> --import "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/gpgsm_cert.p12 &&
>>
>> gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K |
>> - grep fingerprint: |
>> - cut -d" " -f4 |
>> + grep -E "(fingerprint|sha1 fpr):" |
>> + cut -d":" -f2- | tr -d " " |
>> tr -d "\\n" >"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" &&
>
>I think this whole thing can (and should) be simplified by
>using gpg's --with-colons output which is intended to be
>machine parsable.I looked for sth like this but gpgs --help does not list it so i didn't dig deeper. I've checked the blame and it seems like this was introduced >19 years ago. So i guess we can probably use this ^^
Show 23 quoted lines
>
>If we'd been using that previously, we wouldn't need to make
>any further changes here.
>
>I think we're making our lives difficult by screen scraping
>here wher we don't need to do so.
>
>The change I made for the Fedora package to fix this does
>it like this:
>
> --- a/t/lib-gpg.sh
> +++ b/t/lib-gpg.sh
> @@ -72,12 +72,10 @@ test_lazy_prereq GPGSM '
> --passphrase-fd 0 --pinentry-mode loopback \
> --import "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/gpgsm_cert.p12 &&
>
> - gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K |
> - grep fingerprint: |
> - cut -d" " -f4 |
> - tr -d "\\n" >"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" &&
> + gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K --with-colons |
> + awk -F ":" "/^fpr:/ {printf \"%s S relax\\n\", \$10}" \
> + >"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" &&This does not quite work for me. It will add the fingerprint without the
colons into the trustlist which is not valid :/
It would need sth like:
+ gpgsm --with-colons --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K |
+ awk -F ":" "/^(fpr|fingerprint):/ {gsub(/.{2}/, \"&:\", \$10);
printf \"%s S relax\\n\", substr(\$10, 1, length(\$10)-1)}" \
+ >"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" &&which looks needlessly complicated. There is probably some better way to do this with/without awk.
Show 39 quoted lines
>
> - echo " S relax" >>"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" &&
> echo hello | gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" >/dev/null \
> -u committer@example.com -o /dev/null --sign -
> '
>
>With a commit message:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git/blob/a7d2f7e53/f/0001-t-lib-gpg-use-with-colons-when-parsing-gpgsm-output.patch
>
>I was hoping to submit that small series in the next day or
>two, while I've got a few days away from $work. If doing it
>that way is appealing, I can submit them. But only if that
>looks like a reasonable improvement to you and others.
>
>> echo " S relax" >>"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" &&
>> diff --git a/t/t4202-log.sh b/t/t4202-log.sh
>> index 5049559861..08556493ce 100755
>> --- a/t/t4202-log.sh
>> +++ b/t/t4202-log.sh
>> @@ -1931,7 +1931,10 @@ test_expect_success GPGSM 'log --graph --show-signature for merged tag x509 miss
>> git merge --no-ff -m msg signed_tag_x509_nokey &&
>> GNUPGHOME=. git log --graph --show-signature -n1 plain-x509-nokey >actual &&
>> grep "^|\\\ merged tag" actual &&
>> - grep "^| | gpgsm: certificate not found" actual
>> + (
>> + grep "^| | gpgsm: certificate not found" actual ||
>> + grep "^| | gpgsm: failed to find the certificate: Not found" actual
>> + )
>> '
>>
>> test_expect_success GPGSM 'log --graph --show-signature for merged tag x509 bad signature' '
>
>Can we make this simpler by adjusting the grep pattern?
>It's certainly a slight trade-off in ease of reading, but it
>saves a subshell and an extra command:
>
> - grep "^| | gpgsm: certificate not found" actual
> + grep -Ei "^| | gpgsm:( failed to find the)? certificate:? not found" actualThanks, will do.
Show 20 quoted lines
> >I did that in a separate patch: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git/blob/a7d2f7e53/f/0004-t4202-match-gpgsm-output-from-GnuPG-2.3.patch > >IMO, this is a bug in gnupg-2.3. I submitted a patch to >resolve it back in November, but have not gotten any >response as yet. :( > > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2021-November/034991.html > >Not that it will preclude us from having to fix this for the >test suite, but it's worth noting why the change is needed >(and when it will no longer be relevant -- if/when we don't >care to support the few early gnupg-2.3.x releases). > >Thanks, > >-- >Todd