Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] config: include file if remote URL matches a glob

> Perhaps it is easier to approach it from the viewpoint of a new
> user who is unfamiliar with what you designed.
> 
> I would imagine that most users would find it natural if a single
> pass precedure read and processed lines as it sees them.
> 
> That is, when the first includeif is evaluated, we have seen only
> 'remote.a.url' whose value is 'bar', so the condition does not hold.
> and then when the second includeif is evaluated, it gets included,
> and we read 'bar'.  But that is wher configuration reading ends;
> remote.b.url is not asked for after we process the second includeif
> til the end.
> 
> If you explain
> 
>  (1) why such a simplest design would not work well; and
> 
>  (2) how the actual design is different from that simplest design to
>      overcome it.
> 
> it would be easier to grok?
> 
> Thanks.