Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] hashmap: allow re-use after hashmap_free()
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2020, 13:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20201030133518.GC3277724@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <a686d0758a2652c91363dcf68da7726093d00c23.1602549650.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:40:43AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Previously, once map->table had been freed, any calls to hashmap_put(), > hashmap_get(), or hashmap_remove() would cause a NULL pointer > dereference (since hashmap_free_() also zeros the memory; without that > zeroing, calling these functions would cause a use-after-free problem). > > Modify these functions to check for a NULL table and automatically > allocate as needed.
Unsurprisingly, I like this direction. The code looks correct to me, though I think you could reduce duplication slightly by checking map->table in find_entry_ptr(). That covers both hashmap_get() and hashmap_remove(). But I'm happy either way.
> I also thought about creating a HASHMAP_INIT macro to allow initializing > hashmaps on the stack without calling hashmap_init(), but virtually all > uses of hashmap specify a usecase-specific equals_function which defeats > the utility of such a macro.
This part I disagree with. If we did:
#define HASHMAP_INIT(fn, data) = { .cmpfn = cmpfn, cmpfn_data = data }then many callers could avoid handling the lazy-init themselves. E.g.:
attr.c | 16 +++------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/attr.c b/attr.c index a826b2ef1f..55a2783f1b 100644 --- a/attr.c +++ b/attr.c @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ static inline void hashmap_unlock(struct attr_hashmap *map) * is a singleton object which is shared between threads. * Access to this dictionary must be surrounded with a mutex. */ -static struct attr_hashmap g_attr_hashmap; +static struct attr_hashmap g_attr_hashmap = { + HASHMAP_INIT(attr_hash_entry_cmp, NULL) +}; /* The container for objects stored in "struct attr_hashmap" */ struct attr_hash_entry { @@ -80,12 +82,6 @@ static int attr_hash_entry_cmp(const void *unused_cmp_data, return (a->keylen != b->keylen) || strncmp(a->key, b->key, a->keylen); } -/* Initialize an 'attr_hashmap' object */ -static void attr_hashmap_init(struct attr_hashmap *map) -{ - hashmap_init(&map->map, attr_hash_entry_cmp, NULL, 0); -} - /* * Retrieve the 'value' stored in a hashmap given the provided 'key'. * If there is no matching entry, return NULL. @@ -96,9 +92,6 @@ static void *attr_hashmap_get(struct attr_hashmap *map, struct attr_hash_entry k; struct attr_hash_entry *e; - if (!map->map.tablesize) - attr_hashmap_init(map); - hashmap_entry_init(&k.ent, memhash(key, keylen)); k.key = key; k.keylen = keylen; @@ -114,9 +107,6 @@ static void attr_hashmap_add(struct attr_hashmap *map, { struct attr_hash_entry *e; - if (!map->map.tablesize) - attr_hashmap_init(map); - e = xmalloc(sizeof(struct attr_hash_entry)); hashmap_entry_init(&e->ent, memhash(key, keylen)); e->key = key;