Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] push: add reflog check for "--force-if-includes"
- From
Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 2, 2020, 15:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20201002150710.GA54370@mail.clickyotomy.dev>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2010021550170.50@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Hi Johannes,
On 10/02/2020 15:52, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 41 quoted lines
> Hi Srinidhi, > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020, Srinidhi Kaushik wrote: > > > Add a check to verify if the remote-tracking ref of the local branch > > is reachable from one of its "reflog" entries. > > > > The check iterates through the local ref's reflog to see if there > > is an entry for the remote-tracking ref and collecting any commits > > that are seen, into a list; the iteration stops if an entry in the > > reflog matches the remote ref or if the entry timestamp is older > > the latest entry of the remote ref's "reflog". If there wasn't an > > entry found for the remote ref, "in_merge_bases_many()" is called > > to check if it is reachable from the list of collected commits. > > > > When a local branch that is based on a remote ref, has been rewound > > and is to be force pushed on the remote, "--force-if-includes" runs > > a check that ensures any updates to the remote-tracking ref that may > > have happened (by push from another repository) in-between the time > > of the last update to the local branch (via "git-pull", for instance) > > and right before the time of push, have been integrated locally > > before allowing a forced update. > > > > If the new option is passed without specifying "--force-with-lease", > > or specified along with "--force-with-lease=<refname>:<expect>" it > > is a "no-op". > > > > Calls to "in_merge_bases_many()" return different results depending > > on whether the "commit-graph" feature is enabled or not -- it is > > temporarily disabled when the check runs [1]. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqtuvhn6yx.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com > > I can verify that the multiple calls to `in_merge_bases_many()` lead to a > problem, and I intend to debug this further, but it is the wrong function > to call to begin with. > > With these two patches, the tests pass for me, and they also reduce the > complexity quite a bit (Junio, could I ask you to put them on top of > sk/force-if-includes?):
Thanks for looking into this. :)
Show 10 quoted lines
> -- snipsnap -- > From 0e7bd31c4cb0ae08ad772ac230eea2dd7a884886 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:33:05 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fixup??? push: add reflog check for "--force-if-includes" > > This follows the pattern used elsewhere. > > Maybe we should also rename this to `commit_array`? It is not a linked > list, after all.
Makes sense. I'll change it.
Show 37 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> remote.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 37533cafc44..2c6c63aa906 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -2441,6 +2441,7 @@ struct reflog_commit_list {
> struct commit **item;
> size_t nr, alloc;
> };
> +#define REFLOG_COMMIT_LIST_INIT { NULL, 0, 0 }
>
> /* Append a commit to the list. */
> static void append_commit(struct reflog_commit_list *list,
> @@ -2514,7 +2515,7 @@ static int is_reachable_in_reflog(const char *local, const struct ref *remote)
> struct commit *commit;
> struct commit **chunk;
> struct check_and_collect_until_cb_data cb;
> - struct reflog_commit_list list = { NULL, 0, 0 };
> + struct reflog_commit_list list = REFLOG_COMMIT_LIST_INIT;
> size_t size = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> --
> 2.28.0.windows.1.18.g5300e52e185
>
>
> From 10ea5640015f4bc7144e8e5b025e31294329c600 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:35:58 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fixup??? push: add reflog check for "--force-if-includes"
>
> We should not call `in_merge_bases_many()` repeatedly: there is a much
> better API for that: `get_reachable_subset()`.Perfect. I wasn't aware of this.
Show 62 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> remote.c | 43 ++++---------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 2c6c63aa906..881415921e2 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -2513,10 +2513,9 @@ static int is_reachable_in_reflog(const char *local, const struct ref *remote)
> {
> timestamp_t date;
> struct commit *commit;
> - struct commit **chunk;
> struct check_and_collect_until_cb_data cb;
> struct reflog_commit_list list = REFLOG_COMMIT_LIST_INIT;
> - size_t size = 0;
> + struct commit_list *reachable;
> int ret = 0;
>
> commit = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &remote->old_oid);
> @@ -2542,61 +2541,27 @@ static int is_reachable_in_reflog(const char *local, const struct ref *remote)
> * Check if the remote commit is reachable from any
> * of the commits in the collected list, in batches.
> */
> - for (chunk = list.item; chunk < list.item + list.nr; chunk += size) {
> - size = list.item + list.nr - chunk;
> - if (MERGE_BASES_BATCH_SIZE < size)
> - size = MERGE_BASES_BATCH_SIZE;
> -
> - if ((ret = in_merge_bases_many(commit, size, chunk)))
> - break;
> - }
> + reachable = get_reachable_subset(list.item, list.nr, &commit, 1, 0);
> + ret = !!reachable;
> + free_commit_list(reachable);
>
> cleanup_return:
> free_reflog_commit_list(&list);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/* Toggle the "commit-graph" feature; return the previously set state. */
> -static int toggle_commit_graph(struct repository *repo, int disable) {
> - int prev = repo->commit_graph_disabled;
> - static int should_toggle = -1;
> -
> - if (should_toggle < 0) {
> - /*
> - * The in_merge_bases_many() seems to misbehave when
> - * the commit-graph feature is in use. Disable it for
> - * normal users, but keep it enabled when specifically
> - * testing the feature.
> - */
> - should_toggle = !git_env_bool("GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH", 0);
> - }
> -
> - if (should_toggle)
> - repo->commit_graph_disabled = disable;
> - return prev;
> -}
> -OK. The tests are passing with or without "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH" by switching to "get_reachable_subset()" we don't have to toggle te feature during the check.
Show 27 quoted lines
> /*
> * Check for reachability of a remote-tracking
> * ref in the reflog entries of its local ref.
> */
> static void check_if_includes_upstream(struct ref *remote)
> {
> - int prev;
> struct ref *local = get_local_ref(remote->name);
> if (!local)
> return;
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: Remove "toggle_commit_graph()" calls around the check.
> - * Depending on whether "commit-graph" enabled or not,
> - * "in_merge_bases_many()" returns different results;
> - * disable it temporarily when the check runs.
> - */
> - prev = toggle_commit_graph(the_repository, 1);
> if (is_reachable_in_reflog(local->name, remote) <= 0)
> remote->unreachable = 1;
> - toggle_commit_graph(the_repository, prev);
> }
>
> static void apply_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
> --
> 2.28.0.windows.1.18.g5300e52e185
> Again, thank you so much working on this! If you'd like, I can go ahead and apply these patches and rename "reflog_commit_list" to "commit_array" in the next series (v10).
Thanks.
-- Srinidhi Kaushik