Re: Segfault during fsck and spreading brokenness
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 25, 2020, 17:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200925174718.GA70005@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <2aa62ff7-0780-8e20-e87d-387152524971@artfulrobot.uk>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 04:48:39PM +0100, Rich wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I was encouraged by a couple of people on stackoverflow to post to this > list. Apols in advance if it's not the right place. > > I encountered a Segfault during fsck on a damaged bare repo (probably due to > a powercut. Possibly during an operation, although not sure):
Thanks for the report. This is definitely the right place.
Show 12 quoted lines
> git --version > git version 2.11.0 > > git fsck --full -v > Checking HEAD link > Checking object directory > Checking tree 11bbc847cf1b4422b3e37830a9eac2e7af6559de > Checking tree 11be4abeb20314de6145dfc0e6180807a74c03dc > --->8 snip 8<--------------------------------------------------------------- > Checking tree 14a4423e86f06c7ad75bf391d138e0cf7790508f > Checking tree 147aeaec72b2f29bf1813494c942fbce497be679 > zsh: segmentation fault git fsck --full -v
It's tough to say from this where the problem might be. If you still have the broken repo and can reproduce, two things that might help:
- trying with a more recent version of Git; we've fixed quite a few
segfaults around corrupted data in the past few years - getting a backtrace; if you can build Git from source, the simplest
thing is just running "gdb --args /path/to/your/git fsck --full -v",
waiting for it to crash, and then running "bt" in the debuggerShow 5 quoted lines
> I learnt about the damage while trying to `git push` from my dev working > tree. I think I did a `git pull` when the `git push` failed. The result of > this was that my *local* repo was also damaged: there was an empty file > created that would stop git operations and on deleting that I got a page > full of errors.
That's concerning; push/pull generally try hard not to let corruption spread. What transport do you use between the two servers? The usual git-over-ssh and git-over-http protocols should be pretty resilient, but I would not be surprised if the old dumb-http protocol, which just downloads remote files wholesale, would be confused by a zero-length loose object file or similar.
-Peff