Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] extend --abbrev support to diff-patch format
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 10, 2020, 10:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200810100038.GB37030@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqd03zej8w.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 12:01:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> writes: > > > Đoàn Trần Công Danh (2): > > revision: differentiate if --no-abbrev asked explicitly > > diff: extend --abbrev support to diff-patch format > > It was not clear, at least to me at all, what these patches are > trying to achieve (i.e. what end-users appreciate) until I saw the > code change X-<. > > The changes to fill_metainfo() make sense to me. It just needs log > messages that explain the intent better. They do not even make it > clear that they want to make the abbreviation length of the object > names on the "index $from..$to $mode" lines configurable.
After reading the original including cover letter, I'm still confused using why --full-index is not the solution for most cases. Perhaps that would be worth touching on, as well.
-Peff