Re: [PATCH] http-push: ensure unforced pushes fail when data would be lost
On 2020-06-23 at 21:28:43, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:23 PM brian m. carlson
> <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> > When we push using the DAV-based protocol, the client is the one that
> > performs the ref updates and therefore makes the checks to see whether
> > an unforced push should be allowed. We make this check by determining
> > if either (a) we lack the object file for the old value of the ref or
> > (b) the new value of the ref is not newer than the old value, and in
> > either case, reject the push.
> > [...]
> > Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
> > Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
>
> Do you want a "Reported-by: Michael Ward <mward@smartsoftwareinc.com>"
> in this vicinity?
Yes, we do. Thanks for reminding me.
--
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204