Re: [PATCH] tests: do not use "slave branch" nomenclature
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 18, 2020, 16:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200618164554.GA616157@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200618163843.22181-1-bonzini@gnu.org>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:38:43PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > > Git does not have slave branches and has never had. Independent > of any future change to the naming of branches, remove the sole > appearance of the term.
I think this is a sensible change, though note that something simpler was proposed recently:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200610165441.iktvzuwz44sbytfg@chatter.i7.local/
and the review suggested using a name that is even more meaningful to the test case (so we not just remove the unwanted names, but make the test easier to follow).
-Peff