Re: [PATCH v3] submodule: port subcommand 'set-branch' from shell to C

> OK, so "we accept -q for uniformity across subcommands, but there is
> nothing to make less verbose in this subcommand" is the answer to my
> question.
> 
> That cannot be read from "... is currently not used"; especially
> with "currently", I expect that most readers would expect we would
> start using it in the (near) future, and some other readers would
> guess that something used to be talkative and we squelched it using
> the option but there no longer is such need because that something
> is now quiet by default and there is no option to make it talkative.