Re: Add a "Flattened Cache" to `git --clone`?
- From
Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
- Date
- May 14, 2020, 21:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200514210501.GY1596452@mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200514203326.2aqxolq5u75jx64q@chatter.i7.local>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:33:26PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> > Assuming my idea doesn't contradict other best practices or standards > > already in place, I'd like to transform the typical `git clone` flow > > from: > > > > Cloning into 'linux'... > > remote: Enumerating objects: 4154, done. > > remote: Counting objects: 100% (4154/4154), done. > > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2535/2535), done. > > remote: Total 7344127 (delta 2564), reused 2167 (delta 1612), > > pack-reused 7339973 > > Receiving objects: 100% (7344127/7344127), 1.22 GiB | 8.51 MiB/s, done. > > Resolving deltas: 100% (6180880/6180880), done. > > > > To subsequent clones (until cache invalidated) using the "flattened > > cache" version (presumably built while fulfilling the first clone > > request above): > > > > Cloning into 'linux'... > > Receiving cache: 100% (7344127/7344127), 1.22 GiB | 8.51 MiB/s, done. > > I don't think it's a common workflow for someone to repeatedly clone > linux.git. Automated processes like CI would be doing it, but they tend > to blow away the local disk between jobs, so they are unlikely to > benefit from any native git local cache for something like this (in > fact, we recommend that people use clone.bundle files for their CI > needs, as described here: > https://www.kernel.org/best-way-to-do-linux-clones-for-your-ci.html).
If the goal is a git local cache, we have this today. I'm not sure this is what Caleb was asking for, though:
git clone --bare https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git base git clone --reference base https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git ext4
- Ted