Re: has anyone bothered to read this "Git is a security risk"?
- From
Santiago Torres Arias <santiago@nyu.edu>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2020, 20:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200414201701.sacbvbgt6ajde7gp@LykOS.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.21.2004141612580.6138@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:13:39PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_blubracket_status_1250123442600513547&d=DwIBAg&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=yZMPY-APGKyVIX7HgQFZJA&m=k4RlH5EiWlU380Hq8LD-BPM9q79__emrQNq4FBNAbh8&s=7_aq2xl8ld0WDJk4yd_gefOvg47E8MdlXvcj5aZwjug&e= >
Yeah,
Not entirely fond of the phrasing to what reads to me like a static-analysis tool (from what I can grok) whitepaper.
I don't think there's much that can be done in this regard though, no?
-Santiago
> rday