Re: [PATCH] pull: avoid running both merge and rebase
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 28, 2020, 15:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200328155627.GB1215566@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.739.git.git.1585345900763.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 09:51:40PM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> When opt_rebase is true, we still first check if we can fast-forward.
> If the branch is fast-forwardable, then we can avoid the rebase and just
> use merge to do the fast-forward logic. However, when commit a6d7eb2c7a
> ("pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only)",
> 2017-06-23) added the ability to rebase submodules it accidentally
> caused us to run BOTH a merge and a rebase. Add a flag to avoid doing
> both.
>
> This was found when a user had both pull.rebase and rebase.autosquash
> set to true. In such a case, the running of both merge and rebase would
> cause ORIG_HEAD to be updated twice (and match HEAD at the end instead
> of the commit before the rebase started), against expectation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
> pull: avoid running both merge and rebase
>
> Cc: Norbert Kiesel nkiesel@gmail.com [nkiesel@gmail.com], Jeff King
> peff@peff.net [peff@peff.net]I'm not sure how cc is supposed to work with GGG, but it clearly didn't here. :)
Anyway, the patch looks good. Thanks for following through on this.
Show 11 quoted lines
> @@ -992,10 +993,12 @@ int cmd_pull(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> if (is_descendant_of(merge_head, list)) {
> /* we can fast-forward this without invoking rebase */
> opt_ff = "--ff-only";
> + ran_ff = 1;
> ret = run_merge();
> }
> }
> - ret = run_rebase(&curr_head, merge_heads.oid, &rebase_fork_point);
> + if (!ran_ff)
> + ret = run_rebase(&curr_head, merge_heads.oid, &rebase_fork_point);It feels like there should be some arrangement of the conditionals that doesn't require setting an extra flag, but I actually don't think there is. And anyway, doing the most obvious and minimal fix here is the right place to start. We don't need more regressions. ;)
-Peff