Re: [PATCH 4/6] t5616: use rev-parse instead to get HEAD's object_id
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 19, 2020, 16:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200319160707.GE3513282@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <b9beadcc510301ba385f1b01b653024c8f369b49.1584625896.git.congdanhqx@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:00:05PM +0700, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Only HEAD's object_id is necessary, rev-list is an overkill. > > Despite POSIX requires grep(1) treat single pattern with <newline> > as multiple patterns. > busybox's grep(1) (as of v1.31.1) haven't implemented it yet. > > Use rev-parse to simplify the test and avoid busybox unimplemented > features.
That makes sense. It would also future-proof us against the test changing the graph such that HEAD actually has ancestors.
Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh b/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh > index 77bb91e976..135187c5b5 100755 > --- a/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh > +++ b/t/t5616-partial-clone.sh > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ test_expect_success 'do partial clone 1' ' > test_expect_success 'verify that .promisor file contains refs fetched' ' > ls pc1/.git/objects/pack/pack-*.promisor >promisorlist && > test_line_count = 1 promisorlist && > - git -C srv.bare rev-list HEAD >headhash && > + git -C srv.bare rev-parse HEAD >headhash &&
Maybe worth using "rev-parse --verify" which would double check that we produced a useful hash (it seems like an unlikely failure mode, but it's easy enough to cover).
-Peff