Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] SHA-256 test fixes, part 8

> Hi brian,
> 
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, brian m. carlson wrote:
> 
> > This is the second-to-last series of test fixes for SHA-256.
> >
> > As mentioned previously, the patch for t3305 seems to indicate a bug in
> > the notes code and I'm not familiar enough with that code to apply a
> > fix.  This is a band-aid to get it working with SHA-256, but any
> > comments on a more robust approach would of course be welcome.
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > * Drop patch for t3404 in favor of Dscho's fix.
> > * Drop patch for t5616 in favor of Jonathan Tan's fix.
> > * Add missing sign-off.
> > * Move test_oid_init into the correct patch.
> 
> Would you terribly mind pushing up your local branch to a public place? I
> used the apply-from-public-inbox.sh script I maintain at
> https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra to apply your patch series
> on top of v2.25.0, but I got this:
> 
> 	Applying: t5607: make hash size independent
> 	Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> 	M       t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh
> 	Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> 	No changes -- Patch already applied.
> 
> (I want to have a look at the notes fanout. Will keep you posted on my
> investigation there.)