Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 7, 2019, 21:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20191107212235.GB29042@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <656dba5afb818d0caa7616d0e58c9728803f8d04.1573148818.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:46:57PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> > > The start_delayed_progress() method is a preferred way to show > optional progress to users as it ignores steps that take less > than two seconds. However, this makes testing unreliable as tests > expect to be very fast. > > In addition, users may want to decrease or increase this time > interval depending on their preferences for terminal noise. > > Create the GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY environment variable to control > the delay set during start_delayed_progress(). Set the value > in some tests to guarantee their output remains consistent.
Thanks for wrapping this up. I obviously think this is a good direction to go. :) A few thoughts:
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/Documentation/git.txt b/Documentation/git.txt > index 9b82564d1a..1c420da208 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git.txt > @@ -544,6 +544,10 @@ other > a pager. See also the `core.pager` option in > linkgit:git-config[1]. > > +`GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY`:: > + A number controlling how many seconds to delay before showing > + optional progress indicators. Defaults to 2.
Not all progress meters use delay. I wonder if that might confuse some users, who would try:
GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=10 git repack -ad
or something, but still see "Enumerating objects".
I guess the key word in your documentation is "optional", but maybe it needs to be spelled out more clearly. I dunno.
Show 12 quoted lines
> @@ -269,7 +270,12 @@ static struct progress *start_progress_delay(const char *title, uint64_t total,
>
> struct progress *start_delayed_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total)
> {
> - return start_progress_delay(title, total, 2, 0);
> + static int delay_in_secs = -1;
> +
> + if (delay_in_secs < 0)
> + delay_in_secs = git_env_ulong("GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY", 2);
> +
> + return start_progress_delay(title, total, delay_in_secs, 0);
> }You asked earlier if it was worth memo-izing the git_env_ulong() call like this. I suspect it doesn't matter much either way, since progress only starts and stops a few times in a given program. But I'm certainly happy with it this way, as it matches most other environment lookups.
-Peff