git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 0/1] git-config --add allows values from stdin

From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date
Sep 22, 2019, 03:11 UTC
Message-ID
<20190922031128.GA76333@syl.lan>
In-Reply-To
<20190917133135.190145-1-git@zjvandeweg.nl>
Hi ZJ,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Zeger-Jan van de Weg wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> When adding or updating configuration values using git-config, the
> values could all be observed by different processes as these are passed
> as arguments. In some environments all commands executed are also all
> logged. When the value contains secrets, this is a side effect that
> would be great to avoid. At GitLab we use Rugged/libgit2 to circumvent
> this property[1].
>
> The following patch allows a value to be set through stdin when the user
> passes a `--stdin` flag.

Interesting. I had thought some time ago about making an interactive line-oriented 'mode' for using 'git-config(1)', which would allow callers to add/delete/fetch multiple variables using only a single process.

This would satisfy a more general use-case than yours: particularly my idea was grown out of wanting to specify or read many configuration entries at once when using a tool built around Git, such as Git LFS.

I had not considered tying '--stdin' to the '--add' (implicit or not) mode of 'git-config(1)'. It is an interesting idea to be sure.

On the one hand, it lends itself to other modes, such as '--get' combined with '--stdin', or '--unset' in the same fashion. One could imagine that each of these would take either a key/value-pair (in the case of '--add') or a set of key(s) (in the remaining cases). The most desirable aspect is that this would allow for a clear path to this series being picked up.

On the other hand, tying '--stdin' to a particular mode of using 'git conifg' seems overly restrictive to me. If I am building a tool that wants to fetch some values in the configuration, and then add/unset others based on the results using only a single process, I don't think that a mode-based '--stdin' flag gets the job done.

One happy medium that comes to mind is a new '--interactive' mode, which implies '--stdin' and would allow the above use-case, e.g.:

  $ git config --interactive <<\EOF
  get core.myval
  set core.foo bar
  unset core.baz
  EOF

(An off-topic note is that it would be interesting to allow more fanciful options than 'get', e.g., 'get' with a '--type' specifier, or some such).

I'm not sure if anyone actually wants to use 'git-config(1)' in this way, but I figured that I would at least share some things that I was thinking about when initially considering this proposal.

Show 13 quoted lines
> [1]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/blob/8ab5bd595984678838f3f09a96798b149e68a939/ruby/lib/gitlab/git/http_auth.rb#L14-15
>
> Zeger-Jan van de Weg (1):
>   Git config allows value setting from stdin
>
>  Documentation/git-config.txt |  5 ++++-
>  builtin/config.c             | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  t/t1300-config.sh            | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>

Thanks, Taylor

Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Phillip Wood
Message 4 of 6 in “git-config --add allows values from stdin”
  1. 0/1 git-config --add allows values from stdinZeger-Jan van de Weg, Sep 17, 2019
  2. 1/1 Git config allows value setting from stdinZeger-Jan van de Weg, Sep 17, 2019
  3. Junio C HamanoSep 17, 2019
  4. Taylor BlauSep 22, 2019
  5. Phillip WoodSep 23, 2019
  6. SZEDER GáborSep 23, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.