Re: [PATCH v2] git-svn: trim leading and trailing whitespaces in author name
- From
Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2019, 07:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190913074700.hwmyalfmn66kkgbs@distanz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cTAY=4cuDyrsPiDH+MUvz4+H4eMKAsmTAETep2On5=q3g@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for the review Eric!
On 2019-09-12 at 20:20:11 +0200, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:56 AM Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> wrote:
> > v2:
> > - move whitespace trimming below defined'ness check as per Eric Sunshine's
> > review comment
> > diff --git a/perl/Git/SVN.pm b/perl/Git/SVN.pm
> > @@ -1494,6 +1494,7 @@ sub check_author {
> > if (!defined $author || length $author == 0) {
> > $author = '(no author)';
> > }
> > + $author =~ s/^\s+|\s+$//g;
>
> Hmm, this still looks questionable. I would have expected the
> whitespace trimming to be below the 'defined' check but before the
> length($author)==0 check (since the length might become 0 once
> whitespace is trimmed).Agree, I didn't consider this case. Will change in v3.
Show 10 quoted lines
> Also, a minor style/comprehension nit: Perhaps I'm just old-school, > but for me, the idiom: > > $author =~ s/^\s+//; > $author =~ s/\s+$//; > > is easier to understand at-a-glance as trimming leading and trailing > whitespace than the more compact (noisy) expression this patch uses. > But that's just a subjective review comment, not necessarily > actionable.
Agree, the form you propose is more readable and saving just a line doesn't seem worth the possible impact on comprehension/readability. Will change in v3.