Re: [Feature Request] Option to make .git not read-only in cloned repos
- From
Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
- Date
- Aug 25, 2019, 11:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190825115929.GA21463@alpha>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAAQViEsZW4PzHr5BrkDHU2kSd_e04n02McGPgrmXGZMpgaTePg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:43:45PM +0200, Albert Vaca Cintora wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Hi git folks, > > Honestly I'm not aware of the reason behind .git being read-only, but > I'm sure there is one. > > However, I'm sure that a large percentage of developers out there will > agree with me that having to use force (-f) to delete every cloned > repo is annoying, and even worse, it creates the bad habit of always > force-deleting everything. > > Would you find reasonable to add an option to keep .git writable on > cloned repos? > > PS: I'm not subscribed to the list, so please CC me on replies. > > Thanks! > Albert
To clarify, you are probably referring to things like pack-files, which are created read-only. Most files / directories in .git are writable.
It think this is already quite old behavior and I could not find any reference as to why this is done.