Re: suggestion for improved docs on autocrlf
- From
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2019, 15:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190813154033.uhi7w5jgwcj4xan7@tb-raspi4>
- In-Reply-To
- <a5b84e2b8184414bb416f3aa83361a1c@bofa.com>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:31:43PM +0000, Yagnatinsky, Mark wrote:
> Thank you once more. Finally, I believe I understood everything you said. > I was about to say that this contradicts my own experience. > But then I remembered that I normally use my IDE rather than the command line. > And I just checked that indeed that the behavior of my IDE is totally different!
Would you like to elobarate which IDE that is? The core.autocrlf handling has been improved a couple of times, and it seams that your IDE does things different from git.git (Which is not ideal)
> It renormalizes line endings of existing files whenever autocrlf is set to input. > Sigh. Okay, great, life makes sense again. I want to yell at my IDE now. > > I now feel brave enough to attempt to come up with better wording for autocrlf docs, if you think that's worth trying.
That would be good, I am happy to review patches.