Re: RFC: Separate commit identification from Merkle hashing
- From
Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
- Date
- May 23, 2019, 21:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190523211916.GA73150@thyrsus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190523205457.GC70860@google.com>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>:
> Honestly, I do think you have missed some fundamental issues. > https://public-inbox.org/git/ab3222ab-9121-9534-1472-fac790bf08a4@gmail.com/ > discusses this further.
Have re-read. That was a different pair of proposals.
I have abandoned the idea of forcing timestamp uniqueness entirely - that was a hack to define a canonical commit order, and my new RFC describes a better way to get this.
I still think finer-grained timestamps would be a good idea, but that is much less important than the different set of properties we can guarantee via the new RFC.
-- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>