Re: [PATCH 0/1] trace2: fix tracing when NO_PTHREADS is defined
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 21, 2019, 21:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190521212744.GC14807@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.222.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:33:58PM -0700, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> As Duy suggested, pthread_getspecific() just returns NULL when NO_PTHREADS > is defined. And pthread_setspecific() silently does not nothing. So this > problem was hidden from view. > > I have to wonder if we should update pthread_*specific() to call BUG() when > NO_PTHREADS is defined as a way to catch unguarded usages easier or make > this issue more clear.
I think it should actually store the data asked for by the caller, as if we were the single thread running. We discussed this as the time of refactoring NO_PTHREADS, but there was only one caller that would have benefited. Now there are two. ;)
Discussion in the subthread of this patch:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20181027071003.1347-2-pclouds@gmail.com/
-Peff