Re: How to exchange rerere/redo resolutions?
- From
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
- Date
- May 10, 2019, 14:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190510140539.77elozdmfnlkys3v@tb-raspi4>
- In-Reply-To
- <b8e56556-6c83-9e37-38e9-ac67f51b5cd2@iee.org>
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 12:23:28AM +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
Show 28 quoted lines
> Hi, > > Is there a mechanism for exchanging the rerere resolutions, so that future > fixups, e.g. future clashes on pu rather than master, can be sent with patch > series? > > My current use case that there is a large patch [1] for updating long to > size_t for use on Windows, which notes that it will have clashes with pu, > but doesn't appear to have any method of sending a rerere resolution (which > the author is already aware of) to the list. Being able to flag up such > fixes should simplify such conflict resolutions. > > I had some very rough ideas about how the resolutions should look rather > similar to three-way conflict markers, with the resolution as the 'base' > (between the ||| - ||| marks), which would be resolved via a --base merge > strategy. > > However if there is already a method for exchanging resolutions, where > should I look? > > Philip > > [1] <20190413151850.29037-1-tboegi@web.de> [PATCH v3 1/1] Use size_t instead > of 'unsigned long' for data in memory > > -- > Philip >
That is not an answer to the question. If it helps, I can rebase the first patch onto git.git/master, and the cherry-pick the next patches. That can happen next week or so. And then let it go through the normal pu->next->master->git-for-windows workflow.