git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v3] rev-list: exclude promisor objects at walk time

From
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Date
Apr 12, 2019, 22:38 UTC
Message-ID
<20190412223847.GO60888@google.com>
In-Reply-To
<20190411040642.GA8418@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 2019.04.11 00:06, Jeff King wrote:
Show 30 quoted lines
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:42:55PM -0700, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> 
> > >   warning: reflog of 'HEAD' references pruned commits
> > >   warning: reflog of 'refs/heads/master' references pruned commits
> > >   fatal: unable to read 71905dfcd543b7cbb0b4b66fbd20379e67220557
> > >   error: last command exited with $?=128
> > >   not ok 23 - repack -d does not irreversibly delete promisor objects
> > > 
> > 
> > Thank you for catching this. I haven't yet figured out the cause. I will
> > look into this more tomorrow and then send a V4 once I've fixed it.
> 
> I'm concerned that this is a sign that the approach I suggested does not
> actually work everywhere. I.e., could this be a case where we have some
> non-promisor object that points to a sub-object that is reachable from
> the promisor pack, but not a direct tip? Before your patch we'd consider
> that sub-object a promisor (because we enumerate all of the graph that
> we do have and mark each such object), but afterwards we would not.
> 
> And I wonder if that confuses pack-objects. Though I think it would
> confuse it in the _opposite_ direction. I.e., using
> --exclude-promisor-objects would count such an object as not-a-promisor
> and would be more inclined to include it in the new pack.
> 
> It is curious that this only turns up with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1, too.
> It seems like any such problem ought to be independent of that.
> 
> Puzzling...
> 
> -Peff

Do you think this justifies going back to the V1 approach (only checking presence of objects pointed to by refs when doing a partial clone)?

Previous: Jeff KingNext: Jeff King
Message 23 of 27 in “clone: do faster object check for partial clones”
  1. clone: do faster object check for partial clonesJosh Steadmon, Apr 3, 2019
  2. Jonathan TanApr 3, 2019
  3. Jeff KingApr 3, 2019
  4. Jonathan TanApr 3, 2019
  5. Josh SteadmonApr 4, 2019
  6. Jeff KingApr 4, 2019
  7. rev-list: exclude promisor objects at walk timeJosh Steadmon, Apr 4, 2019
  8. Jeff KingApr 4, 2019
  9. Josh SteadmonApr 4, 2019
  10. Jeff KingApr 5, 2019
  11. Josh SteadmonApr 5, 2019
  12. Josh SteadmonApr 8, 2019
  13. rev-list: exclude promisor objects at walk timeJosh Steadmon, Apr 8, 2019
  14. Christian CouderApr 8, 2019
  15. Josh SteadmonApr 8, 2019
  16. Junio C HamanoApr 9, 2019
  17. Jeff KingApr 9, 2019
  18. Junio C HamanoApr 9, 2019
  19. Josh SteadmonApr 9, 2019
  20. SZEDER GáborApr 9, 2019
  21. Josh SteadmonApr 9, 2019
  22. Jeff KingApr 11, 2019
  23. Josh SteadmonApr 12, 2019
  24. Jeff KingApr 13, 2019
  25. Josh SteadmonApr 19, 2019
  26. clone: do faster object check for partial clonesJosh Steadmon, Apr 19, 2019
  27. Jeff KingApr 22, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.