Re: [PATCH 0/3] prettier bisect output
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 5, 2019, 04:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190305041617.GD19800@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD1puPt2c+EJRaBZmd_Fi5uJn0e4fthw8cpKoj7k+5Oy4g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 07:33:17PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > I've run across this many times, too. Since it's been bugging me for a > > decade, I thought I'd finally try to address it. Here are some patches. > > > > There was some discussion about a year ago about just using "git show" > > for this output: > > > > https://public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD3QhTUj+j3vBGrm0sTQ2dSOLS-m2_PwFj6DZS4VZHKRTQ@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > Christian seemed generally OK with tweaking the output, but preferred > > not to move all the way to running an external "git show". > > Yeah, I am still OK with tweaking the output, though I'd rather not go > back to using an external process.
By the way, I've done a few bisects since writing this, and I've been very happy with the result. So I endorse my own patch. ;)
-Peff