Re: [RFC PATCH] pack-refs: fail on falsely sorted packed-refs
- From
Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
- Date
- Feb 23, 2019, 07:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190223070914.GC2354@jessie.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <87lg2kj91a.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:08:01AM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> You have an extra two whitespaces after "&&" there.
Thanks, will check it.
>> + git commit --allow-empty -m commit && > Looks like just "test_commit A" would do here.
About this I'm not sure. AFAIK test_commit does lots of stuff, so can it be considered "just" compared to "commit --allow-empty" or the opposite? I could replace it with test_commit for uniformity reason though.
> We can fail in these sorts of loops. There's a few ways to deal with > that. Doing it like this with "break" will still silently hide errors:
Thanks, this was pointed point
>> + printf "$head_object refs/heads/b00\\n" >>.git/packed-refs && > > Looks like just "echo" here would be simpler since we only use printf to > add a newline.
Could it happen so that "echo" adds '\r\n' at Windows? I could use echo.
> Instead of "! git ..." use "test_must_fail git ...". See t/README. This > will hide e.g. segfaults.
Thanks, this was pointed point
Show 7 quoted lines
> Also, perhaps: > > test_must_fail git ... 2>stderr && > grep "broken sorting in packed-refs" stderr > > Would make this more obvious/self-documenting so we know we failed due > to that issue in particular.
Thanks, will change it