Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] test-lib: parse some --options earlier
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 3, 2019, 04:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190103045359.GC20047@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20181230190419.GB6120@szeder.dev>
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 08:04:19PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > (in fact, given that this is just > > the internal tests, I am tempted to say that we should just make it > > "-r<arg>" for the sake of simplicity and consistency. But maybe somebody > > would be annoyed. I have never used "-r" ever myself). > > I didn't even know what '-r' does...
I had to look it up, too. :)
> And I agree that changing it to '-r<arg>' would be the best, but this > patch series is about adding '--stress', so changing how '-r' gets its > mandatory argument (and potentially annoying someone) is beyond the > scope, I would say.
OK, I'm fine with that (though once we've built the infrastructure to handle its unstuck form, I don't know if there's much point in changing it, so we can probably just let it live on forever).
-Peff