Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 1/1] Use size_t instead of 'unsigned long' for data in memory

> From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
> 
> Currently the length of data which is stored in memory is stored
> in "unsigned long" at many places in the code base.
> This is OK when both "unsigned long" and size_t are 32 bits,
> (and is OK when both are 64 bits).
> On a 64 bit Windows system am "unsigned long" is 32 bit, and
> that may be too short to measure the size of objects in memory,
> a size_t is the natural choice.
> 
> Improve the code base in "small steps", as small as possible.
> The smallest step seems to be much bigger than expected.