Re: [PATCH 2/2] built-in rebase: reinstate `checkout -q` behavior where appropriate
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 9, 2018, 10:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20181109101148.GB7410@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <070092b4309e5e74e3a1b3be54613cccf26e97da.1541756054.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 01:34:19AM -0800, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > When we converted a `git checkout -q $onto^0` call to use > `reset_head()`, we inadvertently incurred a change from a twoway_merge > to a oneway_merge, as if we wanted a `git reset --hard` instead. > > This has performance ramifications under certain, though, as the > oneway_merge needs to lstat() every single index entry whereas > twoway_merge does not. > > So let's go back to the old behavior.
Makes sense. I didn't think too hard about any possible gotchas with the twoway/oneway switch, but if that's what git-checkout was doing before, it seems obviously safe.
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c > index 6f6d7de156..c1cc50f3f8 100644 > --- a/builtin/rebase.c > +++ b/builtin/rebase.c > @@ -523,11 +523,12 @@ finished_rebase: > #define GIT_REFLOG_ACTION_ENVIRONMENT "GIT_REFLOG_ACTION" > > static int reset_head(struct object_id *oid, const char *action, > - const char *switch_to_branch, int detach_head, > + const char *switch_to_branch, > + int detach_head, int reset_hard,
It might be worth switching to a single flag variable here. It would make calls like this:
> - if (reset_head(&options.onto->object.oid, "checkout", NULL, 1, > + if (reset_head(&options.onto->object.oid, "checkout", NULL, 1, 0, > NULL, msg.buf))
a little more self-documenting (if a little more verbose).
Show 10 quoted lines
> - if (!oid) {
> - if (get_oid("HEAD", &head_oid)) {
> - rollback_lock_file(&lock);
> - return error(_("could not determine HEAD revision"));
> - }
> - oid = &head_oid;
> + if (get_oid("HEAD", &head_oid)) {
> + rollback_lock_file(&lock);
> + return error(_("could not determine HEAD revision"));
> }This one could actually turn into:
ret = error(...); goto leave_reset_head;
now. We don't have to worry about an uninitialized desc.buffer anymore (as I mentioned in the previous email), because "nr" would be 0.
It doesn't save any lines, though (but maybe having a single cleanup/exit point would make things easier to read; I dunno).
Take all my comments as observations, not objections. This looks OK to me either way.
-Peff