Re: [PATCH 2/2] t/t7510-signed-commit.sh: add signing subkey to Eris Discordia key
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- Nov 4, 2018, 15:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20181104151013.GH731755@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20181104094710.27859-2-mgorny@gentoo.org>
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 10:47:10AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > index e8377286d..86d3f93fa 100755 > --- a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > +++ b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > @@ -197,9 +197,9 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'show bad signature with custom format' ' > test_expect_success GPG 'show untrusted signature with custom format' ' > cat >expect <<-\EOF && > U > - 61092E85B7227189 > + 65A0EEA02E30CAD7 > Eris Discordia <discord@example.net> > - D4BE22311AD3131E5EDA29A461092E85B7227189 > + F8364A59E07FFE9F4D63005A65A0EEA02E30CAD7 > D4BE22311AD3131E5EDA29A461092E85B7227189 > EOF > git log -1 --format="%G?%n%GK%n%GS%n%GF%n%GP" eighth-signed-alt >actual && > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'show untrusted signature with custom format' ' > test_expect_success GPG 'show unknown signature with custom format' ' > cat >expect <<-\EOF && > E > - 61092E85B7227189 > + 65A0EEA02E30CAD7
It's my understanding that GnuPG will use the most recent subkey suitable for a particular purpose, and I think the test relies on that behavior. However, I'm not sure that's documented. Do we want to rely on that behavior or be more explicit? (This is a question, not an opinion.)
-- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204