Re: [PATCH v2] gpg-interface.c: detect and reject multiple signatures on commits
- From
Tacitus Aedifex <aedifex@sdf.org>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2018, 22:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20181004225229.GA15236@SDF.ORG>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180817073441.5247-1-mgorny@gentoo.org>
I think that there is a more simple way to catch multiple signatures see below. Other than that, I like this patch.
Signed-off-by: Tacitus Aedifex <aedifex@sdf.org> --- gpg-interface.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gpg-interface.c b/gpg-interface.c index db17d65f8..a4dba3361 100644 --- a/gpg-interface.c +++ b/gpg-interface.c @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static void parse_gpg_output(struct signature_check *sigc) { const char *buf = sigc->gpg_status; int i; + int multi_sig = 0; /* Iterate over all search strings */ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sigcheck_gpg_status); i++) { @@ -115,6 +116,23 @@ static void parse_gpg_output(struct signature_check *sigc) next = strchrnul(found, '\n'); sigc->signer = xmemdupz(found, next - found); } + } else + multi_sig++; + + /* + * GOODSIG, BADSIG, etc. can occure only once for each signature. + * Therefore, if we had more than one then we're dealing with + * multiple signatures. We don't support them currently and they are + * rather hard to create, so something is likely probably not right + * and we should reject them altogether. + */ + if (multi_sig > 1) { + sigc->result = 'E'; + /* clear partial data to avoid confusion */ + if (sigc->signer) + FREE_AND_NULL(sigc->signer); + if (sigc->key) + FREE_AND_NULL(sigc->key); } } } -- 2.18.0.129.ge333175